Leviticus v. Leviathan

Chapter Five Excerpts

Law and Institutions

Read the Introduction

Read the Foreword

Sample Each Chapter

Book Reviews

Contact Mr. Holstad

Schedule Wayne Holstad for Your Group

Order by credit card ~ Order by check or money order

© Alethos Press LLC

PO Box 600160

St. Paul, MN 55106

Webmaster

 

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Chapter 5

Chapter 6

Chapter 7

Chapter 8

Chapter 9

Chapter 10

Chapter 11

Chapter 12

Chapter 13

Chapter 14

Chapter 15

Home Page

      By July 4, 1776, the colonists had agreed to a common understanding of the meaning of “the laws of nature and of nature’s God.” They adopted this terminology as part of their legal argument in the Declaration of Independence. American law would rest upon this principle.
      The law of nature and of nature’s God was understood to be God’s eternal moral law, or divine law, and was based on the same law of God described in the Old and New Testaments. The founding fathers’ understanding of the “law of nature and of nature’s God” does not even closely resemble the “law of nature” described by Hobbes. Hobbes contrasted the need for law to counter the uncivilized and barbaric existence of the beasts and the brutes. Hobbes’ law of nature needed to be restrained. The founding fathers’ definition of the “law of nature and of nature’s God” also stands in sharp contrast to the modern view of natural selection and the law of the jungle. The evolutionist view of the law of nature resembles Hobbes but presents a negative view of man, needing protection by a greater power to protect it from itself, rather than the positive portrayal of the aspirations of man as used in the Declaration of Independence. From John Locke to Sir William Blackstone, the rights of Englishmen were tied to the natural law of man found in God’s general revelation through creation and God’s special revelation given through Scripture. Locke and Blackstone were basic texts of political and legal philosophy in the colonies, read and followed by all political leaders and the courts.

Legal Rights as Englishmen

      The colonists appealed to the British authorities for protection of their rights as Englishmen. Though they lived in the colonies, they were still British citizens. The Resolution of the Stamp Act Congress in 1765 rested upon the colonists’ entitlement to “all the inherent rights and privileges of his natural born subjects within the kingdom of Great Britain.” The colonists declared allegiance “to the crown of Great Britain...and all due subordination to that august body, the Parliament of Great Britain.” Despite the repeal of the Stamp Act, Parliament imposed numerous other oppressive measures.
      At the First Continental Congress in 1774, the delegates considered and adopted the law of nature, as well as the British Constitution, and the American Colonial Charters, as the source of colonial rights. The Declaration of Rights in the Resolves of the First Continental Congress specifically referred to “the immutable laws of nature.” Later, when the Declaration of Independence was written, there was no mention of the rights of Englishmen, as it was their purpose to sever all ties to the British Constitution.

Chapter Sample Page          Home Page